The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-3085•Nancy E. Whitaker v. Merit Systems Protection Board
15-3085Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMar 18, 2016
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
NANCY E. WHITAKER,
Petitioner
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent
______________________
2015-3085
______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
Board in No. CH-3330-14-0634-I-1.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
AMOS J ONES , Amos Jones Law Firm, Washington, DC,
argued for petitioner.
SARA B. REARDEN, Office of the General Counsel,
Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued
for respondent. Also represented by BRYAN G. P OLISUK.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
-- 1 of 2 --
P ER CURIAM (N EWMAN, MOORE, and STOLL , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 18, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.