The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1895•Baker Hughes, Inc. v. Nalco Company
15-1895Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMar 15, 2016
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
BAKER HUGHES, INC.,
Appellant
v.
NALCO COMPANY,
Appellee
______________________
2015-1895
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/000,524,
95/001,399.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CHRISTOPHER A ARON SHIELD, Bracewell & Giuliani,
LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented
by J ONATHAN R. SPIVEY .
J AMES W. P ORADEK, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP,
Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented
by EDMOND AHADOME, L AUREN J. F RANK , T IMOTHY E.
G RIMSRUD; R OBERT J. BARZ, D EVON C. BEANE, J ASON
ALEXANDER ENGEL , K&L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (REYNA, WALLACH , and STOLL , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 15, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.