The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1630•Netac Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sandisk Corporation
15-1630Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 9, 2016
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
NETAC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
Appellant
v.
SANDISK CORPORATION,
Appellee
______________________
2015-1630
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/000,384.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
WENYE T AN, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA,
argued for appellant. Also represented by XIAOQUN WU.
D ARRYL J. ADAMS , Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, ar-
gued for appellee. Also represented by B RIAN W. O AKS ;
RUSSELL J. CRAIN, Dallas, TX.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
-- 1 of 2 --
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, M AYER and REYNA,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 9, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.