Grandeye Limited v. Google Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
GRANDEYE LIMITED,
Appellant
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2015-1622, 2015-1624, 2015-1625
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2013-00546, IPR2013-00547, IPR2013-00548.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
S TEPHEN YEE CHOW, Burns & Levinson, LLP, Boston,
MA, argued for appellant.
P RATIK A. SHAH , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld,
LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also repre-
sented by EMILY CURTIS J OHNSON, D AVID V ONDLE, ZE-WEN
J ULIUS CHEN, C ONO A. CARRANO, ASHRAF F AWZY .
J EREMIAH HELM , Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for

-- 1 of 2 --

intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by T HOMAS
W. K RAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER , STACY BETH
MARGOLIES .
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (O’MALLEY , WALLACH , and HUGHES ,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 28, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --