Full text
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
INTERFACE, INC.,
Appellant
v.
TANDUS CENTIVA INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2015-1475, 2015-1668
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2013-00333, IPR2013-00527.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CANDICE C. D ECAIRE , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented
by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES , Winston-Salem, NC.
BARRY J. HERMAN, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice
LLP, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellee. Also represent-
ed by P RESTON HAMILTON HEARD, D ANA E. STANO, Atlan-
ta, GA.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (REYNA, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
