Rudolph Technologies, Inc. v. Camtek, Ltd.

15-1434Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 3, 2016

Full text

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CAMTEK, LTD.,
Defendant-Appellant
______________________
2015-1434
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota in No. 0:05-cv-01396-JRT-FLN,
Judge John R. Tunheim.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
D ANIEL W. MCD ONALD, Merchant & Gould P.C., Min-
neapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also repre-
sented by RACHEL C. HUGHEY , MICHAEL A. ERBELE .
D ANIEL HOWARD BROMBERG, Quinn Emanuel Ur-
quhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for
defendant-appellant. Also represented by CLAUDE M.
STERN; D AVID L EON B ILSKER, San Francisco, CA.
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY , and WALLACH , Cir-
cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 3, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.