Full text
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE: VI-JON, INC.,
Appellant
______________________
2015-1387
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,150.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
ANDREW C. RYAN, Cantor Colburn LLP, Hartford, CT,
argued for appellant.
SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA,
argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented
by T HOMAS W. K RAUSE, MEREDITH H OPE SCHOENFELD,
AMY J. N ELSON.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
-- 1 of 2 --
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, D YK and REYNA,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
January 11, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
