The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1330•Trueposition Inc. v. Polaris Wireless, Inc.
15-1330Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDec 15, 2015
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
TRUEPOSITION INC.,
Appellant
v.
POLARIS WIRELESS, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2015-1330
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013-
00323.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MICHAEL J. BONELLA, Condo Roccia Koptiw LLP,
Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented
by MICHAEL J ORDAN.
J ASON P AUL D E MONT , Kaplan, Breyer, Schwarz & Ot-
tesen, LLP, Matawan, NJ, argued for appellee. Also
represented by K ENNETH O TTESEN; VINCENT MCG EARY ,
MICHAEL CUKOR, McGeary Cukor LLC, Morristown, NJ;
BRAD P EDERSEN, Patterson Thuente Pedersen, P.A.,
Minneapolis, MN.
-- 1 of 2 --
J OSEPH MATAL , Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for
intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by T HOMAS
W. K RAUSE, SCOTT W EIDENFELLER , J EREMIAH HELM .
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, BRYSON, and WALLACH , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
December 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.