in Re Mark C. Jackson v. U.S. Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 309 Case: 14-142 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed:…

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE MARK C. JACKSON,
Petitioner.
______________________
2014-142
______________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United
States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:14-cv-00277-NBF,
Judge Nancy B. Firestone.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Before REYNA, BRYSON, and T ARANTO, Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
Mark C. Jackson petitions for a writ of mandamus re-
lating to his complaint brought before the United States
Court of Federal Claims.
On July 23, 2014, Jackson filed a notice of appeal,
docketed as 2014-5121, from the judgment of the Court of
Federal Claims dismissing his complaint for lack of juris-
diction. A party who seeks a writ bears the burden of
proving that he has no other means of obtaining the relief
desired. Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 309
Case: 14-142 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 08/05/2014

-- 1 of 2 --

IN RE JACKSON 2
(1989). Because Jackson may raise arguments concerning
his case in his appeal, mandamus relief is not appropriate.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
(2) All pending motions are denied as moot.
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
s26
Case: 14-142 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 08/05/2014

-- 2 of 2 --