Synbias Pharma v. Solux Corporation

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SYNBIAS PHARMA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SOLUX CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________________
2013-1672
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of California in No. 3:11-cv-03035-H-
BGS, Judge Marilyn L. Huff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SYNBIAS PHARMA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SOLUX CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2014-1287
______________________
Case: 13-1672 Document: 32 Page: 1 Filed: 04/24/2014

-- 1 of 3 --

SYNBIAS PHARMA v. SOLUX CORPORATION 2
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of California in No. 3:11-cv-03035-H-
BGS, Judge Marilyn L. Huff.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
O R D E R
Solux Corporation moves to voluntarily dismiss Ap-
peal No. 2013-1672. Synbias Pharma responds. Synbias
moves without opposition for an extension of time to file
its opening brief in Appeal No. 14-1287 by June 4, 2014.
Solux requests that its appeal be dismissed “neither
with nor without prejudice.” The court generally does not
indicate whether an appeal is dismissed with or without
prejudice. Instead, it is the court’s practice to simply
“dismiss” when an appellant seeks to voluntarily dismiss
its appeal.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion to dismiss is granted. Appeal No.
2013-1672 is dismissed.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs in Appeal No.
2013-1672.
(3) The revised official caption for Appeal No. 2014-
1287 is reflected above.
(4) The motion for extension of time is granted.
Synbias’s opening brief in Appeal No. 2014-1287 shall be
due by June 4, 2014.
Case: 13-1672 Document: 32 Page: 2 Filed: 04/24/2014

-- 2 of 3 --

SYNBIAS PHARMA v. SOLUX CORPORATION 3
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As To 13-1672 Only):
April 24, 2014
s30
Case: 13-1672 Document: 32 Page: 3 Filed: 04/24/2014

-- 3 of 3 --