The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1670•Opti Inc. v. Via Technologies, Inc., Via Technologies, Inc. (taiwan)
13-1670Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 8, 2016
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
OPTI INC.,
Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant
v.
VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., VIA TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. (TAIWAN),
Defendants-Appellants
______________________
2013-1670, 2014-1839
______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:10-cv-00279-JRG,
Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MICHAEL L OUIS BRODY , Winston & Strawn LLP, Chi-
cago, IL, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also repre-
sented by J AMES ETHAN MCC OMB; G EOFFREY P. EATON,
Washington, DC.
BRIAN A NDREW C ARPENTER , Beuther Joe & Carpenter
LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for defendants-appellants. Also
represented by ERIC WILLIAM BEUTHER ; T IMOTHY J.H.
CRADDOCK, Klemchuk LLP, Dallas, TX.
-- 1 of 2 --
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, D YK, and HUGHES , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.