Promega Corporation v. Applied Biosystems, LLC, Life Technologies Corporation

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
PROMEGA CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC, LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
AND CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
Defendants-Appellants.
______________________
2013-1454
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois in No. 13-CV-2333, Circuit
Judge Richard A. Posner.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MARTIN R. L UECK, Robins, Kaplan, Miller, & Ciresi
L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-
appellee. With him on the brief were CYRUS A. M ORTON
and SHARON E. R OBERG-P EREZ, of Minneapolis, Minneso-
ta; and MATTHEW B. MCF ARLANE, of New York, New York.
EDWARD R. R EINES , Weil Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of
Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendants-

-- 1 of 2 --

appellants. Of counsel on the brief were BRIAN CANNON,
L INDA J. BREWER , R ORY S. MILLER, Quinn Emanuel Ur-
quhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California.
Of counsel on the brief was BRADFORD P AUL SCHMIDT , Life
Technologies Corporation, of Carlsbad, California. Of
counsel was D EREK C. WALTER , Weil Gotshal & Manges,
LLP, of Redwood Shores, California.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , MAYER , and CHEN, Circuit Judg-
es).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --