The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1442•Panduit Corporation v. Adc Telecommunications, Inc.
13-1442Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApr 17, 2014
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
PANDUIT CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
Appellee.
______________________
2013-1442
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination
No. 95/000,415.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
J ESSE O. COLLIER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexan-
dria, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the
brief were J AMES A. OLIFF and J OHN W. O’M EARA .
P HILIP P. CASPERS , Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh
Lindquist & Schuman, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota,
argued for appellee. With him on the brief were T IMOTHY
A. L INDQUIST , SAMUEL A. HAMER and J OSEPH W. WINKELS .
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, P ROST , and O’MALLEY , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
April 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.