Full text
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE VISTAPRINT TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
______________________
2013-1261, -1550
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in consoli-
dated Reexamination Nos. 90/009,295, 90/009,296,
90/009,313, and 90/009,315.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
J OHN A. D RAGSETH , Fish & Richardson P.C., of Min-
neapolis, Minnesota, argued for appellant. With him on
the brief was RICHARD J. ANDERSON.
MICHAEL S. F ORMAN, Associate Solicitor, Office of the
Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of
Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on
the brief were N ATHAN K. K ELLEY , Acting Solicitor, and
BRIAN T. RACILLA, Associate Solicitor.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
-- 1 of 2 --
P ER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY , and
HUGHES , Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
