Samsung International, Inc. v. United States

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2013-1183
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of International
Trade in No. 10-CV-0015, Judge Jane A. Restani.
______________________
Decided: December 6, 2013
______________________
F ELICIA L EBORGNE N OWELS , Akerman Senterfitt, of
Tallahassee, Florida, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With
her on the brief were K ATHERINE E. G IDDINGS , N ANCY M.
WALLACE , and MICHAEL J. L ARSON.
MARCELLA P OWELL , Trial Attorney, Civil Division,
Commercial Litigation Branch, United States Department
of Justice, of New York, New York, argued for the defend-
ant-appellee. With her on the brief were STUART F.
D ELERY , Acting Assistant Attorney General, and J EANNE
E. D AVIDSON, Director, of Washington, DC, and BARBARA

-- 1 of 2 --

SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL , INC. v. US 2
S. WILLIAMS , Attorney in Charge, International Trade
Field Office of New York, New York. Of counsel on the
brief was P AULA S. SMITH , Trial Attorney, Office of Assis-
tant Chief Counsel, International Trade Litigation, Unit-
ed States Customs and Border Protection, of New York,
New York.
______________________
Before N EWMAN, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Samsung International, Inc. (Samsung) appeals from
the judgment of the United States Court of International
Trade (CIT) that Samsung’s V3 and V4 Plasma Display
Modules are “flat panel screen assemblies” classified
under subheading 8529.90.53 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedules of the United States. We adopt the reasoning
of the CIT in all respects and therefore affirm.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --