Full text
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY
LICENSING, L.P.
______________________
2013-1138
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination
No. 90/008,095.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
F RANK V. P IETRANTONIO, Cooley LLP, of Reston, Vir-
ginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were
J ONATHAN G. G RAVES , OF RESTON, VIRGINIA, AND L ORI R.
MASON and L OWELL D. MEAD of Palo Alto, California.
T HOMAS W. K RAUSE, Associate Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia
argued for appellee. Of counsel on the brief were N ATHAN
K. K ELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and S TACY B. MARGOLIES ,
Associate Solicitor.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
-- 1 of 2 --
P ER CURIAM (WALLACH , L INN, and T ARANTO , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
November 7, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
