The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1112•IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (doing business as Lenox) v. Bibow Industries, Inc. and Christopher W. Bibow
13-1112Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitSep 23, 2013
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (doing
business as Lenox),
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER W.
BIBOW,
Defendants-Appellants.
______________________
2013-1112
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts in No. 11-CV-30023, Judge
Douglas P. Woodlock.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
RACHAEL A. HARRIS , Squire Sanders (US) LLP, of
Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her
on the brief was J OHN A. BURLINGAME .
EDWARD P. D UTKIEWICZ, of Dade City, Florida, argued
for defendants-appellants.
-- 1 of 2 --
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (N EWMAN, P ROST , and WALLACH , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
September 23, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.