Full text
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE: PRICEPLAY, INC.
______________________
2013-1102
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/009,444.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
SCOTT M. D ANIELS , Westerman, Hattori, Daniels &
Adrian, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for Appellant.
With him on the brief was D ARRIN A. AUITO .
WILLIAM L AMARCA , Associate Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia,
argued for appellee. With him on the brief were N ATHAN
K. K ELLEY, Deputy Solicitor and STACY B. MARGOLIES ,
Associate Solicitor.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
-- 1 of 2 --
P ER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER , and T ARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
October 10, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
