The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1058•Gabriel Technologies Corporation, and Trace Technologies, LLC v. Qualcomm Incorporated, Snaptrack, Inc., and Norman Krasner
13-1058Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMar 18, 2014
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
GABRIEL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, AND
TRACE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, SNAPTRACK, INC.,
AND NORMAN KRASNER,
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________
2013-1058
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of California in No. 08-CV-1992, Judge
Anthony J. Battaglia.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MICHAEL E. SALZMAN , Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP,
of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.
With him on the brief was RONALD ABRAMSON. Of counsel
was P ETER A. SULLIVAN.
T IMOTHY S. T ETER , Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, Califor-
nia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the
brief were J EFFREY S. K ARR and L ORI R. MASON, of Palo
-- 1 of 2 --
Alto, California, and S TEVEN M. STRAUSS , of San Diego,
California.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, MAYER , and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 18, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.