Jan K. Voda, M.d. v. Medtronic, Inc., and Medtronic Vascular, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
JAN K. VODA, M.D.,
Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant,
v.
MEDTRONIC, INC., AND
MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC.,
Defendants-Appellants.
______________________
2013-1045, -1053
______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Western District of Oklahoma in No. 09-CV-0095, Senior
Judge Leonard Tim.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MITCHELL G. STOCKWELL , Kilpatrick Townsend &
Stockton LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for plaintiff-
cross-appellant. With him on the brief were D. CLAY
HOLLOWAY , ALYSON L. WOOTEN and RICHARD W.
G OLDSTUCKER. Of counsel on the brief was J OHN A.
K ENNEY , McAffee & Taft, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
MARK C. F LEMING, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and
Dorr, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defend-

-- 1 of 2 --

ants-appellants. With him on the brief were L AUREN B.
F LETCHER , SARAH B. P ETTY , and SHIRLEY X. L I CANTIN. Of
counsel on the brief was MICHAEL SIMONS , Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, of Austin, Texas.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (N EWMAN, CLEVENGER , and R EYNA,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
November 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --