Deep9 Corporation v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., and Barnesandnoble.com, LLC

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DEEP9 CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BARNES & NOBLE, INC., AND
BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________
2013-1031
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Western District of Washington in No. 11-CV-0035, Judge
James L. Robart.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CHRISTIAN E. MAMMEN, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of
San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
Of counsel on the brief were ERIC B. F ASTIFF and D AVID T.
RUDOLPH , Lieff, Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, of
San Francisco, California; and K IM D. STEPHENS and
CHASE ALVORD, Tousley Brain Stephens, PLLC, of Seat-
tle, Washington.

-- 1 of 2 --

J OHN B. Q UINN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-
appellees. Of counsel on the brief were D AVID EISEMAN
and J EFFREY S. G ERCHICK, of Washington, DC; and
MELISSA J. BAILY , of San Francisco, California.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, O’MALLEY , and WALLACH , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
May 13, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --