The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1009•Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation
13-1009Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApr 10, 2013
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SIDENSE CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
2013-1009
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in No. 10-CV-2066, Judge
Susan Y. Illston.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MARK L. H OGGE, SNR Denton US, LLP, of Washing-
ton, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the
brief were SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI , RACHEL REPKA,
K HALIQ A. I MRAN and ANDREW BLAIR . Of counsel was
J AMES A. K LENK.
ROGER L. C OOK, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton,
LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-
appellee. With him on the brief were ROBERT D. T ADLOCK
and SARA B. G IARDINA. Of counsel was J OSHUA HAMILTON
L EE , of Atlanta, Georgia.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, L OURIE, and
O'MALLEY , Circuit Judges.).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
April 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.