Nextec Applications, Inc. v. Brookwood Companies, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
NEXTEC APPLICATIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BROOKWOOD COMPANIES, INC.,
Defendant-Cross-Appellant.
______________________
2012-1670, -1685
______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York in No. 07-CV-6901, Senior
Judge Thomas P. Griesa.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
N AGENDRA SETTY , Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &
Hampton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for
plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were STEPHEN
S. K ORNICZKY , EDWARD V. ANDERSON, and MICHAEL
MURPHY . Of counsel was D ANIEL N ICHOLAS YANNUZZI, of
San Diego, California.
D ARYL L. J OSEFFER , King & Spalding, LLP, of Wash-
ington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With
him on the brief were K AREN F. G ROHMAN; ADAM M.

-- 1 of 2 --

CONRAD, of Charlotte, North Carolina; ETHAN H ORWITZ, of
New York, New York; and MARY K ATHERINE BATES , of
Atlanta, Georgia.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER , Chief Judge, M AYER , and CHEN,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
November 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --