Insituform Technologies, Inc. and Ina Acquisition Corp. v. AMERIK SUPPLIES, INC. (formerly known as BJR Trading U.S.A., Inc.) AND ERIK NIELSEN

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
AND INA ACQUISITION CORP.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
AMERIK SUPPLIES, INC. (formerly known as BJR
Trading U.S.A., Inc.)
AND ERIK NIELSEN,
Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs- Appellees,
v.
COSMIC-SONDERMASCHINENBAU GMBH,
Third Party Defendant-Appellant.
______________________
2012-1655, -1656
______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois in No. 08-CV-0333, Judge
Timothy C. Batten, Sr.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
D EAN L. F RANKLIN, Thompson Coburn LLP, of St.
Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him

-- 1 of 2 --

on the brief were ALAN H. N ORMAN, MICHAEL L. N EPPLE
and MATTHEW A. BRAUNEL .
D ANIEL A. K ENT , Kent Law, P.C., of Alpharetta, Geor-
gia, argued for third party defendant-appellant.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (N EWMAN, P ROST , and WALLACH , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
September 23, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --