in Re Ricoh Company, Ltd. Patent Litigation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -… v. Ricoh Company, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT
LITIGATION
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RICOH COMPANY, LTD.,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
RICOH COMPANY, LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, AMI
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MATROX ELECTRONIC
SYSTEMS, LTD., MATROX GRAPHICS, INC.,
MATROX INTERNATIONAL, INC., MATROX TECH,
INC., AND AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC.,
Defendants.
______________________
2012-1522
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in No. 03-CV-2289, Judge
James Ware.

-- 1 of 2 --

______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of
Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee.
With him on the brief was RON E. SHULMAN .
K ENNETH W. BROTHERS , Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of
Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With
him on the brief were G ARY M. H OFFMAN ; and K RISTA M.
CARTER, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel was ASSAD H.
RAJANI, of Palo Alto, California.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER C URIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON , and D YK , Circuit Judg-
es).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 12, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --