Panduit Corporation v. Teresa Stanek Rea, ACTING DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
PANDUIT CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
Teresa Stanek Rea, A CTING DIRECTOR, UNITED S TATES
P ATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ,
Appellee,
AND
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS,
Cross Appellant.
______________________
2012-1435, -1436
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in
Reexamination No. 95/000,412.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
J ESSE O. COLLIER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexan-
dria, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief

-- 1 of 2 --

were J AMES A. O LIFF , J OHN W. O’MEARA , and ERIC D.
MOREHOUSE.
COKE M ORGAN STEWART , Associate Solicitor, Office of
the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on
the brief was ROBERT J. MCMANUS , Associate Solicitor. Of
counsel were N ATHAN K. K ELLEY , Solicitor, and SCOTT
WEIDENFELLER , Associate Solicitor.
P HILIP P. CASPERS , Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh
Lindquist & Schuman, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota,
argued for cross appellant. With him on the brief were
T IMOTHY A. L INDQUIST , SAMUEL A. HAMER , and J OSEPH W.
WINKELS .
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, L OURIE, and P ROST ,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
August 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --