The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1434•Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Msd International Gmbh v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
12-1434Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 7, 2013
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MSD
INTERNATIONAL GMBH,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________________
2012-1434
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey in No. 10-CV-3085, Judge Jose L.
Linares.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
D AVID T. P RITIKIN, Sidley Austin, LLP, of Chicago,
Illinois, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the
brief were WILLIAM H. BAUMGARTNER , J R. and
CONSTANTINE L. T RELA , J R.; and P ETER S. CHOI, of Wash-
ington, DC; and T ODD L. K RAUSE, of New York, New York.
Of counsel on the brief were P AUL D. MATUKAITIS ,
EDWARD W. MURRAY and L ISA A. J AKOB, Merck & Co.,
Inc., of Rahway, New Jersey. Of counsel was D ONALD A.
-- 1 of 2 --
ROBINSON, Robinson, Wettre & Miller LLC, of Newark,
New Jersey.
T HOMAS J. P ARKER , Alston & Bird, LLP, of New York,
New York, argued for defendant-appellant. Of counsel
were BLAS P. ARROYO and J ITENDRA MALIK , of Charlotte,
North Carolina; and D EEPRO MUKERJEE, of New York,
New York.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, M AYER , and REYNA, Circuit Judg-
es).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 7, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.