The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2012-1316•Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corporation
2012-1316Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 12, 2013
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CORDIS CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
2012-1316
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 10-CV-0315, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
YOUNG J. P ARK, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of New
York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.
G REGORY L. D ISKANT , Patterson Belknap Webb &
Tyler, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for
defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was E UGENE
M. G ELERNTER.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE , P ROST , and WALLACH , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 12, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.