Winegard Company v. ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as King Controls)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
WINEGARD COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED SYSTEMS, INC.
(doing business as King Controls),
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
2012-1282
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Iowa in case no. 09-CV-0138, Senior
Judge Charles R. Wolle.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
ROBERT V.P. WATERMAN , JR., Lane & Waterman LLP,
of Davenport, Iowa, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With
him on the brief was APRIL A. M ARSHALL.
RANDALL T. SKAAR, Skaar Ulbrich Macari, P.A., of
Minnetonka, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant.
With him on the brief was SCOTT G. U LBRICH .
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (D YK , PLAGER, and R EYNA, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
November 16, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --