Convolve, Inc. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Compaq Computer Corporation

12-1074Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJul 2, 2013

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
July 2, 2013
ERRATA
______________________
Appeal No. 2012-1074
CONVOLVE, INC. AND
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC AND SEAGATE
TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Decided: July 1, 2013
Nonprecedential Opinion
______________________
Please make the following changes:
“CHRISTOPHER D. L ANDGRAFF , Bartlit Beck Her-
man Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued
for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was
MARK E. F ERGUSON. Of counsel was VINCENT BUCCOLA,
Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago,
Illinois; CARTER G. P HILLIPS and ROBERT N. HOCHMAN,
Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC; N ATALIA V.

-- 1 of 2 --

BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. J ACOBS , McDermott, Will &
Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.” to
“CHRISTOPHER D. L ANDGRAFF , Bartlit Beck Herman
Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for
defendant-appellee Compaq Computer Corporation. With
him on the brief was MARK E. F ERGUSON.
CARTER G. P HILLIPS , Sidley Austin LLP, of Washing-
ton, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Seagate Tech-
nology, LLC, et al. With him on the brief was ROBERT N.
HOCHMAN. Of counsel on the brief were N ATALIA V.
BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. J ACOBS , McDermott, Will &
Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.”

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.