Full text
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE FINJAN, INC.
______________________
2011-1542
(Reexamination No. 90/008,684)
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
P AUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for appellant.
With him on the brief were L ISA K OBIALKA and J AMES R.
HANNAH .
N ATHAN K. K ELLEY , Associate Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia,
argued for Director of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN,
Solicitor, and COKE MORGAN STEWART and ROBERT J.
MCMANUS , Associate Solicitors.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AND CONSIDERED, IT IS
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (M OORE, BRYSON, AND O’MALLEY , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
January 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
