Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PALM, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
2011-1296
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 09-CV-0272, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CARSON P. VEACH , Freeborn & Peters, LLP, of
Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him
on the brief were DAVID S. BECKER and JACOB D. K OERING.
ROBERT T. H ASLAM, Covington & Burling LLP, of
Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendant-
appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL M.
M ARKMAN and ROBERT WILLIAMS of San Francisco,
California.
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, D YK , and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
January 18, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --