Seiko Epson Corporation v. Coretronic Corporation

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
and
EPSON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. and
EPSON AMERICA, INC.,
Counterclaim Defendants,
v.
CORETRONIC CORPORATION,
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee,
and
OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2011-1120
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in Case No. 06-CV-6946,
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel.

-- 1 of 2 --

______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
EDWARD P. WALKER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of
Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim
defendant-appellant and counterclaim defendant appellees.
With him on the brief were JAMES A. O LIFF, JOHN W.
O’M EARA and WILLIAM J. UTERMOHLEN .
S TEVEN D. H EMMINGER, Alston and Bird, LLP, of Menlo
Park, California, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-
appellee and defendant-appellee. With him on the brief
were YITAI H U and ELIZABETH H. RADER.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER C URIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON , and DYK , Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
October 11, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --