The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2011-1052•Mag Instrument, Inc. v. THE BRINKMANN CORPORATION, Cross-Appellant. 2011-1052,-1053 (Opposition Nos.…
2011-1052Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitNov 9, 2011
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MAG INSTRUMENT, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
THE BRINKMANN CORPORATION,
Cross-Appellant.
____________________
2011-1052,-1053
(Opposition Nos. 91164169, 91164340, and 91163534)
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
ROBERT C. WEISS , Law Offices of Robert C. Weiss, of
Manhattan Beach, California, argued for appellant. With
him on the brief were ANNA E. RAIMER , Jones Day, of
Houston, Texas, and JERROLD B. REILLY, Mag Instrument,
Inc., of Ontario, California.
G ARY A. CLARK , Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &
Hampton, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for
cross-appellant. With him on the brief was SUSAN M.
H WANG.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (BRYSON, CLEVENGER , and PROST, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
November 9, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.