The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2010-1382•Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC. [errata]
2010-1382Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitSep 29, 2011
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
September 29, 2011
ERRATA
______________________
Appeal No. 2010-1382
KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. AND
KIMBERLY-CLARK GLOBAL SALES, LLC,
v.
FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS, LLC AND
FIRST QUALITY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC,
Decided: June 1, 2011
Nonprecedential Opinion
______________________
Please make the following changes:
Page 10, line 16, change “a” to --an--
Page 10, lines 18-19, delete “raised a substantial question
of validity for” and insert --asserted a defense to--.
Page 10, lines 19-20, delete “cannot be characterized as
substantially meritless” and insert --raises a substantial
question of validity and does not lack substantial merit--
Page 14, lines 1-2, delete “raised a substantial question of
validity for” and insert --asserted a defense to--
Page 14, line 3 delete “cannot be characterized as sub-
-- 1 of 2 --
KIMBERLY-CLARK v. FIRST QUALITY 2
stantially meritless” and insert --raises a substantial
question of validity and does not lack substantial merit--
Page 18, line 2, delete “raised a substantial question of
validity for” and insert --asserted a defense to--
Page 18, line 3-4, delete “cannot be characterized as
substantially meritless” and insert --raises a substantial
question of validity and does not lack substantial merit--
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.