The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2010-1298•DAVID D. PROBERT and JACKLYN O. PROBERT v. the Clorox Company, Inc.
2010-1298Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDec 9, 2010
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DAVID D. PROBERT and JACKLYN O. PROBERT,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
THE CLOROX COMPANY, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
2010-1298
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Utah in No. 07-CV-0139, Judge Dee V. Benson.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
TODD E. Z ENGER, Kirton & McConkie, of Salt Lake
City, Utah, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.
D AVID R, WRIGHT, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake
City, Utah, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on
the brief were DAVID R. TODD and CLINTON E. D UKE.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
-- 1 of 2 --
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (G AJARSA, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
December 9, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.