Qimonda Ag v. International Trade Commission

2010-1270Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJan 18, 2011

Full text

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
QIMONDA AG,
Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee,
and
LSI CORPORATION,
Intervenor,
and
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, SEAGATE
TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS INC., SEAGATE
TECHNOLOGY LLC, and SEAGATE (US) LLC,
Intervenors.
____________________
2010-1270
______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade
Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-665.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

BRIAN R. M ATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of
Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the
brief were G. BRIAN BUSEY , M ARK E. U NGERMAN and
M ICHAEL W. M AAS ; and ADAM K ESER , of McLean, Virginia.
SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG , Attorney, Office of the
General Counsel, United States International Trade
Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee.
With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS , General
Counsel, and ANDREA C. CASSON , Assistant General
Counsel.
BRUCE S. SOSTEK, Thompson & Knight LLP, of Dallas,
Texas, argued for all intervenors. With him on the brief
for LSI Corporation were JANE P. BRANDT, H ERBERT J.
H AMMOND, M AX C ICCARELLI, RICHARD L. WYNNE, J R. and
M ICHAEL H EINLEN . Also on the brief for Seagate
Technology, et al.. were JOHN M. CARACAPPA and C HARLES
F. SCHILL, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, G AJARSA and
PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
January 18, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.