Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Diam USA, Inc.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2010-1052
SE-KURE CONTROLS, INC.,
Plaintiff/Cross Claim Defendant-
Appellant,
v.
DIAM USA, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
POP DISPLAYS USA, LLC (successor in interest to Diam USA, Inc.),
Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
POP DISPLAYS, LLC, POP DISPLAYS, INC., and
DIAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendants,
v.
TELEFONIX, INC.,
Cross Claim Plaintiff/Third Party
Defendant-Appellee.
Richard D. Harris, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for
plaintiff/cross claim defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Herbert H. Finn,
Kevin J. O’Shea, and Cameron M. Nelson.
Lee F. Grossman, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for all
appellees. With him on the brief was Mark M. Grossman, Grossman Law Offices, of
Arlington, Illinois.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Judge Ronald A. Guzman

-- 1 of 3 --

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2010-1052
SE-KURE CONTROLS, INC.,
Plaintiff/Cross Claim Defendant-
Appellant,
v.
DIAM USA, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
POP DISPLAYS USA, LLC (successor in interest to Diam USA, Inc.),
Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
POP DISPLAYS, LLC, POP DISPLAYS, INC., and
DIAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendants,
v.
TELEFONIX, INC.,
Cross Claim Plaintiff/Third Party
Defendant-Appellee.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois
In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-4857.

-- 2 of 3 --

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED May 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly_________________________
Jan Horbaly, Clerk

-- 3 of 3 --