Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Technologies Corp.

2010-1003Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDec 10, 2010

Full text

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
INTAMIN, LTD.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
2010-1003
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in no. 04-CV-0511, Judge
Gary A. Feess.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
TED S. W ARD , Berke, Kent & Ward LLP, of Los
Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
JOHN B. S GANGA, J R., Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear,
LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee.
With him on the brief were PAUL A. STEWART, JOSEPH S.
CIANFRANI , D AVID G. JANKOWSKI and CHRISTOPHER L.
ROSS .
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, P LAGER and
G AJARSA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
December 10, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.