TODD FOX and JANET FOX v. John E. Potter, POSTMASTER GENERAL

2009-1376Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 17, 2010

Full text

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-1376
TODD FOX and JANET FOX,
Appellants,
v.
John E. Potter, POSTMASTER GENERAL,
Appellee.
David P. Hendel, Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for
appellants. Of counsel on the brief was Sarah M. Graves, Akerman Senterfitt LLP, of
Vienna, Virginia.
David A. Harrington, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil
Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee.
With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson,
Director, and Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director.
Appealed from: United States Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals
Administrative Judge David I. Brochstein

-- 1 of 2 --

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-1376
TODD FOX and JANET FOX,
Appellants,
v.
John E. Potter, POSTMASTER GENERAL,
Appellee.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals
In CASE NO(S). 6159 and 6169.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED February 17, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.