The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2009-1372•1380, -1416, -1417 Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.
2009-1372Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitSep 6, 2012
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
__________________________
September 6, 2012
ERRATA
__________________________
Appeal Nos. 2009-1372, -1380, -1416, -1417
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
AND
THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF
TECHNOLOGY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.,
Defendant-Cross Appellant.
__________________________
AND
Appeal No. 2010-1291
MCKESSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (formerly
McKesson Information Solutions, LLC),
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
-- 1 of 2 --
AKAMAI v. LIMELIGHT & MCKESSON v. EPIC 2
EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
Decided: August 31, 2012
Precedential Opinion
__________________________
Please make the following changes:
Page 21, line 12 of Judge Newman’s dissent, change “Maj.
op. 22–23 n.4” to --Maj. op. 22 n.4--.
Page 30, line 24 of Judge Newman’s dissent, change “maj.
op. 26–27” to --maj. op. 26--.
Page 9, line 14 of Judge Linn’s dissent, change “Maj. Op.
30-31” to --Maj. Op. 30--.
Page 13, line 18 of Judge Linn’s dissent, change “Maj. Op.
27” to --Maj. Op. 26-27--.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.