The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2009-1069•Peer Communications Corporation v. SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA, SKYPE, INC., and EBAY, INC.
2009-1069Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 6, 2009
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-1069
PEER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA, SKYPE, INC.,
and EBAY, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Michael T. Cooke, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, Texas, argued for
plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jonathan T. Suder. Of counsel on the
brief were Edward R. Nelson, III, and Steven W. Hartsell, Nelson Bumgardner Casto,
P.C., of Fort Worth, Texas. Of counsel was Stephen D. Susman, Susman Godfrey
L.L.P., of Houston, Texas.
Andrei Iancu, Irell & Manella LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for
defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Morgan Chu, Alan J. Heinrich and
Benjamin T. Wang.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Judge Leonard Davis
-- 1 of 2 --
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-1069
PEER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA, SKYPE, INC.,
and EBAY, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas
in CASE NO(S). 6:06-CV-370.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MAYER, RADER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges )
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED October 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.