The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2008-3102•Donald A. Recino v. United States Postal Service
2008-3102Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitAug 18, 2008
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-3102
DONALD A. RECINO,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Respondent.
Peter C. Nelson, of Rochester, New York, argued for petitioner.
Dawn E. Goodman, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division,
United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On
the brief were Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E.
Davidson, Director, Reginald T. Blades, Jr., Assistant Director, and Gregg M. Schwind,
Trial Attorney.
Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board
-- 1 of 2 --
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-3102
DONALD A. RECINO,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Respondent.
.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board
in CASE NO(S). NY0752060327-I-1.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED August 18, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.