The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2008-1289•Crater Corporation v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and AT&TCOMPANY
2008-1289Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApr 2, 2009
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1289
CRATER CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and AT&T COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
Robert Schultz, Schultz & Associates LLP, of Chesterfield, Missouri, argued for
plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Ronald J. Eisenberg.
K. Lee Marshall, Bryan Cave LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendants-
appellees. With him on the brief was Louis F. Bonacorsi.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Judge E. Richard Webber
-- 1 of 2 --
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1289
CRATER CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and AT&T COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri
in CASE NO(S). 4:98-CV-00913
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED April 2, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.