Celerity, Inc. v. Ultra Clean Technology Systems and Service, Inc.

2008-1205Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 9, 2008

Full text

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1205
CELERITY, INC.,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
v.
ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant,
and
ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Keith L. Slenkovich, Thelen LLP, of San Jose, California, argued for
plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Robert E. Camors, Jr.,
Christopher L. Ogden, Karin M. Frenza, and Tomomi K. Harkey.
Paul J. Andre, King & Spalding LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, argued for
defendant/counterclaimant-appellant and defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were
Lisa Kobialka and Amy Sun.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Maxine M. Chesney

-- 1 of 2 --

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1205
CELERITY, INC.,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-
Appellee,
v.
ULTRA CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant/Counterclaimant-
Appellant,
and
ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California
in CASE NO(S). 05-CV-4374 and 05-CV-3560
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (GAJARSA, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: October 9, 2008 / s /Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.