The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2008-1113•Venture Industries Corporation v. AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.)
2008-1113Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJul 10, 2008
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1113
VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
VEMCO, INC., PATENT HOLDING COMPANY,
and LARRY J. WINGET,
Plaintiffs,
v.
AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.),
Defendant-Appellee.
John E. Anding, Drew Cooper & Anding, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, argued for
plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Thomas V. Hubbard and Theodore J.
Westbrook.
Cyrus Amir-Mokri, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of New York,
New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Peter E. Greene.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Senior Judge Avern Cohn
-- 1 of 2 --
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1113
VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
VEMCO, INC., PATENT HOLDING COMPANY,
and LARRY J. WINGET,
Plaintiffs,
v.
AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.),
Defendant-Appellee.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan
in CASE NO(S). 99-CV-75354
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (DYK, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED July 10, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.