Revolution Eyewear v. Aspex Eyewear [errata]

2008-1050Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 20, 2009

Full text

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
E R R A T A
February 20, 2009
Appeal No. 2008-1050, Revolution Eyewear v. Aspex Eyewear
Precedential Opinion
Decided: February 13, 2009
____________________________________________________________________
Please make the following change:
Page 9, line 16, change the word “it” in the clause “shielded by the covenant should it
be returned . . . ” so that the clause reads:
“shielded by the covenant should the same eyewear be returned . . .”

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.