The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2008-1050•Revolution Eyewear v. Aspex Eyewear [errata]
2008-1050Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 20, 2009
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
E R R A T A
February 20, 2009
Appeal No. 2008-1050, Revolution Eyewear v. Aspex Eyewear
Precedential Opinion
Decided: February 13, 2009
____________________________________________________________________
Please make the following change:
Page 9, line 16, change the word “it” in the clause “shielded by the covenant should it
be returned . . . ” so that the clause reads:
“shielded by the covenant should the same eyewear be returned . . .”
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.