Spiroflow Systems, Inc. v. Flexicon Corporation

CORRECTED
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1034
SPIROFLOW SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FLEXICON CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
W. Thad Adams, III, Adams Intellectual Property Law, P.A., of Charlotte, North
Carolina, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Stephen S. Ashley, Jr.
Randolph J. Huis, Volpe and Koenig, P.C., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued
for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stephen B. Schott. Of counsel on
the brief were Michael S. Connor, Lance A. Lawson, and Brian F. McMahon, Alston &
Bird, LLP, of Charlotte, North Carolina. Of counsel was John J. O’Malley, Volpe and
Koenig, P.C., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Magistrate David Keesler

-- 1 of 2 --

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1034
SPIROFLOW SYSTEMS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FLEXICON CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of North
Carolina
In CASE NO(S). 3:02-CV-70.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit
Judge).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: June 10, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --