The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2007-6002•6003 Robert Solomon v. Office of Compliance
2007-6002Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitSep 9, 2008
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-6002, -6003
ROBERT SOLOMON,
Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE,
Respondent,
and
OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL,
Respondent.
Jeffrey H. Leib, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
William Wachter, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Compliance,
of Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of Compliance. With him on the brief
was Peter A. Eveleth, General Counsel.
Kelsi Brown Corkran, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States
Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of the Architect
of the Capitol. With her on the brief were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney
General, and Marleigh D. Dover, Attorney.
Appealed from: Office of Compliance
-- 1 of 2 --
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-6002, -6003
ROBERT SOLOMON,
Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE,
Respondent,
and
OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL,
Respondent.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance
In CASE NO(S). 02-AC-62 (RP) and 04-AC-13 (RP).
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK,
Circuit Judge.
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: _September 9, 2008____ / s / Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.