The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2007-1210•1245 Meritor Transmission Corporation v. Eaton Corporation
2007-1210Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDec 13, 2007
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1210, -1245
MERITOR TRANSMISSION CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EATON CORPORATION,
Defendant-Cross Appellant.
Daniel R. Cherry, Welsh & Katz, LTD, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-
appellant. With him on the brief were Walter J. Kawula, Jr., Brian J. Sodikoff and
M..Lee Murrah, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, ARVINMERITOR, INC., of Troy,
Michigan.
John A. Burlingame and Donnie Lewis Kidd, Jr, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey
L.L.P., of Washington, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With them on the brief
was William H. Mandir, of Sughrue Mion PLLC, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina.
Judge Lacy H. Thornburg
-- 1 of 2 --
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1210, -1245
MERITOR TRANSMISSION CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EATON CORPORATION,
Defendant-Cross Appellant.
JUDGMENT
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the
Western District of North Carolina
In CASE NO(S). 1:04-CV-178
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, MAYER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: December 13, 2007 / s / Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.